[patch] fix anachronism in libstdc+ docs
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely.gcc@gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 18:26:00 GMT 2013
* doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml: Fix anachronism.
committed to trunk
-------------- next part --------------
commit ab11f53f4046adc88e1f43568836c572bcd3bc44
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Apr 20 20:31:32 2013 +0100
* doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml: Fix anachronism.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml
index 1f3da2f..7b35d05 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/extensions.xml
@@ -87,10 +87,11 @@ extensions, be aware of two things:
3.1, 3.2 and 3.3).
</para>
- <para>Please note that the upcoming C++ standard has first-class
+ <para>Please note that the concept checks only validate the requirements
+ of the old C++03 standard. C++11 was expected to have first-class
support for template parameter constraints based on concepts in the core
- language. This will obviate the need for the library-simulated concept
- checking described above.
+ language. This would have obviated the need for the library-simulated concept
+ checking described above, but was not part of C++11.
</para>
</chapter>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list