Fix PR 56077

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Fri Apr 5 15:52:00 GMT 2013


On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:28:11PM +0200, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 13:22 , Andrey Belevantsev <abel@ispras.ru> wrote:
> >>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01625.html
> >> 
> >>  I don't know whether backporting this would be better than reverting
> >>  the offending change as just done on 4.7.
> > 
> > I'd say for 4.6 the best way is to revert.  PR 56077 is not that important, and this 4.6 release will be the last one.  For 4.7, we can additionally backport Maxim's patch or revert this one.  I'm fine with both options, but I'll test 4.7 backport too just to be ready for that.
> 
>  Understood, thanks. Who's decision is it to pick one track or the other for 4.7 ?
> 
>  RMs in addition to the maintainers of this particular area ?

As written in PR56848, the patch should be reverted for 4.7.3
and reapplied together with the additional fix after 4.7.3 is released
(before 4.7.3 release there is just too short time to do anything else,
while before 4.7.4 there will be plenty of time to test it sufficiently).

	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list