[Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan

[Mikael Morin]

On 15/09/2012 19:36, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
> 
> thanks for your comments.
> 
> As a pre-script: Will you look at Paul's revised assignment patch - or
> should I do it?
I looked at it twice or so, and couldn't get the double temporary thing.
I'll get back to it.

> If you want to know the Coverity's diagnostic, you can also have access
> to GCC's Coverity scan results. Are you interested?
I have no plans to make anything out of them in the foreseeable future;
for later I don't know, why not.

> Thanks for the analysis. Will you create a patch?
> 
Attached. Tested against "*namelist*" and full regression test in
progress. OK?

Mikael



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: namelist_undo.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20120916/a8e8c114/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: namelist_75.f90
Type: text/x-fortran
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20120916/a8e8c114/attachment-0001.bin>