[C++ Patch] PR 54583

[Jason Merrill]

On 10/30/2012 07:44 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> straightforward fix. The below, which regtests fine, simply acts on any
> MULT_EXPR as TYPE_SIZE, which I think should be fine, but, in case the
> idea is basically Ok, we could also consider the more complex but more
> sophisticated variably_modified_type_p?

I think I'd use EXPR_P rather than check for a particular tree code.

Jason