[PATCH] Fix PR53501

Andrew Pinski pinskia@gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 02:21:00 GMT 2012


On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:57 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:53 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > It failed with revision 188008.
>>>
>>> OK, thanks.  So the testcase never compiled on the trunk (except for about
>>> 24
>>> hours between 188009 & 188118) or did it compile before 188008 at some
>>> point?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Botcazo>>
>> It was OK until revision 187042:
>>
>>     2012-05-02  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
>>
>>         * tree.c (valid_constant_size_p): New function.
>>         * tree.h (valid_constant_size_p): Declare.
>>         * cfgexpand.c (expand_one_var): Adjust check for too large
>>         variables by using valid_constant_size_p.
>>         * varasm.c (assemble_variable): Likewise.
>>
>>         c/
>>         * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Properly check for sizes that
>>         cover more than half of the address-space.
>>
>>         cp/
>>         * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Properly check for sizes that
>>         cover more than half of the address-space.
>>
>>     2012-05-02  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
>>
>>         * fold-const.c (div_if_zero_remainder): sizetypes no longer
>>         sign-extend.
>>         (int_const_binop_1): New worker for int_const_binop with
>>         overflowable parameter.  Pass it through
>>         to force_fit_type_double.
>>         (int_const_binop): Wrap around int_const_binop_1 with overflowable
>>         equal to one.
>>         (size_binop_loc): Call int_const_binop_1 with overflowable equal
>>         to minus one, forcing overflow detection for even unsigned types.
>>         (extract_muldiv_1): Remove bogus TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE special-casing.
>>         (fold_binary_loc): Call try_move_mult_to_index with signed offset.
>>         * stor-layout.c (initialize_sizetypes): sizetypes no longer
>>         sign-extend.
>>         (layout_type): For zero-sized arrays ignore overflow on the
>>         size calculations.
>>         * tree-ssa-ccp.c (bit_value_unop_1): Likewise.
>>         (bit_value_binop_1): Likewise.
>>         * tree.c (double_int_to_tree): Likewise.
>>         (double_int_fits_to_tree_p): Likewise.
>>         (force_fit_type_double): Likewise.
>>         (host_integerp): Likewise.
>>         (int_fits_type_p): Likewise.
>>         * varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_field): Sign-extend the
>>         field-offset to cater for negative offsets produced by the Ada frontend.
>>         * omp-low.c (extract_omp_for_data): Convert the loop step to
>>         signed for pointer adjustments.
>>
>> which gave:
>>
>> /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
>> -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ -O3 -Wall -mx32
>> -maddress-mode=long -fPIC -S x.i
>> x.i: In function ‘dl_start’:
>> x.i:30:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
>>  }
>>  ^
>> (insn 54 53 55 7 (set (reg:SI 108)
>>         (const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("_dl_rtld_map") [flags
>> 0x42] <var_decl 0x7f02997bb140 _dl_rtld_map>)
>>                 (const_int -1073742800 [0xffffffffbffffc30])))) x.i:22 -1
>>      (nil))
>> x.i:30:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2130
>>  }
>>  ^
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>>
>
> It looks like we are using unsigned type for array index:

We always used unsigned type for array index and for the left hand
side of POINTER_PLUS_EXPR.  I think your issue is somewhere else.
Like maybe in expand.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


>
> (gdb)  list
> 2163            tree element = TREE_TYPE (type);
> 2164
> 2165            build_pointer_type (element);
> 2166
> 2167            /* We need to know both bounds in order to compute the size.  */
> 2168            if (index && TYPE_MAX_VALUE (index) && TYPE_MIN_VALUE (index)
> 2169                && TYPE_SIZE (element))
> 2170              {
> 2171                tree ub = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (index);
> 2172                tree lb = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (index);
> (gdb) call debug_tree (index)
>  <integer_type 0x7ffff1ab6000
>     type <integer_type 0x7ffff199d000 sizetype public unsigned sizetype SI
>         size <integer_cst 0x7ffff1989d40 constant 32>
>         unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff1989d60 constant 4>
>         align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff199d000
> precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff1989d80 0> max <integer_cst
> 0x7ffff1989000 4294967295>>
>     SI size <integer_cst 0x7ffff1989d40 32> unit size <integer_cst
> 0x7ffff1989d60 4>
>     align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff1ab6000
> precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff1989d80 0> max <integer_cst
> 0x7ffff1aa3260 33>>
> (gdb)
>
>
> --
> H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list