[RFC] PR 53063 encode group options in .opt files

Manuel López-Ibáñez lopezibanez@gmail.com
Thu May 17 17:29:00 GMT 2012


On 17 May 2012 19:25, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Chung-Lin Tang
> <cltang@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On 2012/5/17 01:55 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>>>> I'm guessing these changes are the cause of a full C bootstrap
>>>> > (--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx) failure I'm seeing on trunk. The
>>>> > *_handle_option_auto function prototypes are not seen in options.c, and
>>>> > -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes are in effect (oddly, such strict checking
>>>> > is not enforced in the default post-stage1 C++ bootstrap)
>>> Yep, We should add -Wmissing-declarations to the post-stage1 flags,
>>> which also exists in C. Could you also add that to your patch?
>>>
>>
>> I'm a little unsure of how -Wmissing-declarations vs
>> -Wmissing-prototypes behave for C? Anyways here's a patch to add
>> -Wmissing-declarations for C++, keeping C as is.
>
> What is the purpose of  -Wmissing-declarations for C++?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134

Cheers,

Manuel.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list