[C++ Patch] PR 44516

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 09:48 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> Can we concisely characterize those messages and exclude them from the
>> gcc_assert?
>
> Well, if don't quickly figure out something better, I guess we can always
> add the assert at the beginning of warning_at, error_at, etc.

I am still puzzled by why we need to assert, as opposed to just ignore, unless
we have a plan to make a wholesale move -- but even there I am bit nervous.

-- Gaby