[RFH / Patch] PR 51222

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Tue May 1 04:28:00 GMT 2012


On 04/30/2012 07:37 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Thus, my question would be: is something like the below in the right
> direction? The alternate possibility I can see, would be basically
> redoing a slightly slimmed version of for_each_template_parm specialized
> for our needs (a few less conditionals)

I think either approach would be fine; I lean toward the first, but 
changing the name and adding a flag for clarity.  Changing the walking 
behavior based on fn being null is too subtle.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list