[RFH / Patch] c++/52432

[Jason Merrill]

On 02/29/2012 01:11 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Thus I'm looking for some help about the best way to proceed. First, do
> we agree that tsubst_copy_and_build should never call
> unqualified_name_lookup_error unconditionally?

Yes.

> Any tips about decltype32.C?

The substitution failure should have removed the candidate from further 
consideration; sounds like something isn't propagating the failure back 
up (as I was talking about in my response to your 51214 patch).

Jason