[PATCH, gdc] - Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc

[Iain Buclaw]

On 19 June 2012 17:08, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Many functions have no leading comment, and other GNU coding standard
> requirements are not followed either. Those should IMHO be fixed also,
> before this front end can be accepted.
>


To separate this from the other listed items.  I am aware of certain
things that are in definite need to spot check over.  (NB: The coding
convention was originally K&R, then changed over to Allman about 2
years ago, and recently changed over to GNU-like via several vim
macros I wrote to carry out the quick re-format job).

As well as the GCC coding convention,  I would like to also know what
of the C++ Coding convention is an absolutely *must* be followed to
the letter on the wiki?  As it states at the top that it is only a
proposed set of coding conventions to be used when writing GCC in C++,
and I am well aware that in GDC I do not follow some items, such as
"All data members should have names which end with an underscore".

http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions


Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';