RFC: C++/OMP PATCH for c++/53565 (libgomp for-2.C failure)

[Dominique Dhumieres]

> Does this make sense to you?

I cannot answer the question, but the patch survived clean bootstrap on
x86_64-apple-darwin10 and powerpc-apple-darwin9 and a full regtest
on the former with the following new failures between r188841 and
r188858:

FAIL: gcc.dg/pubtypes-2.c scan-assembler long+[ \\t]+0x6a+[ \\t]+[#;]+[ \\t]+Length of Public Type Names Info
FAIL: gcc.dg/pubtypes-3.c scan-assembler long+[ \\t]+0x6a+[ \\t]+[#;]+[ \\t]+Length of Public Type Names Info
FAIL: gcc.dg/pubtypes-4.c scan-assembler long+[ \\t]+0xa1+[ \\t]+[#;]+[ \\t]+Length of Public Type Names Info

FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-data-member2.C -std=gnu++98   scan-assembler-not DW_TAG_enumerator
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-data-member2.C -std=gnu++98    scan-assembler-not DW_TAG_enumeration_type
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-data-member2.C -std=gnu++11   scan-assembler-not DW_TAG_enumerator
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-data-member2.C -std=gnu++11    scan-assembler-not DW_TAG_enumeration_type

I am pretty sure that the first set is due to r188857, but I don't
know for the g++ one.

Thanks for the patch,

Dominique