[google-4.6]Backport r183875 to fix incorrect increment/decrement of atomic pointers (issue 6428056)
dougkwan@google.com
dougkwan@google.com
Thu Jul 19 22:29:00 GMT 2012
This seems to be different from r183875. Are the parts chaing
is_look_free() in r183875 necessary? If not why?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6428056/
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list