[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/53732

[Mikael Morin]

Hello,

Revision 180898:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=180898
introduced at the end of gfc_add_loop_ss_code some self recursive calls 
to handle reductions' loops (like in sum for example).
However, as gfc_add_loop_ss_code already calls itself to handle scalar 
and vector subscripts, the new calls had to be disabled if there was 
such a subscript, as in that case the reduction(s) would have been 
handled from within the subscript call.
Back then, I didn't pay attention, however, to the fact that the 
subscript flag was set to true in all the subscript calls, so the 
reductions are then handled with subscript set to true, which introduces 
an unwanted conversion to gfc_array_index_type and the failure leading 
to the PR.

The patch below (which is the one posted on bugzilla) disables reduction 
handling if subscript is true, so that the reductions are handled from 
the outer call instead of from the subscript call.
I have finally convinced myself that it is always right, as if there is 
a reduction in a subscript, gfc_add_loop_ss_code will call 
gfc_conv_expr_descriptor which will create a temporary, and the 
reduction will be handled separatedly in a new loop initializing the 
temporary.

Regression tested on x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0.
OK for trunk/4.7?

Mikael

-------------- next part --------------
2012-07-15  Mikael Morin  <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/53732
	* trans-array.c (gfc_add_loop_ss_code): Disable self recursive calls
	handling nested loop(s) if the subscript flag is true.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pr53732_v1.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1271 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20120703/ed5ff13d/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
2012-07-03  Mikael Morin  <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/53732
	* gfortran.dg/inline_sum_4.f90: New test.


-------------- next part --------------
! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/53732
! this was leading to an internal "mismatching comparison operand types" error
!
! Contributed by minzastro <minzastro@googlemail.com>

program test
implicit none

real*8 arr(4, 4, 4, 4)

arr(:,:,:,:) = 1d0

arr(1, :, :, = sum(arr, dim=1, mask=(arr(:,:,:,:) > 0d0))

end program test