PR lto/51698 and the state of LTO + transactional memory

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Wed Jan 25 20:08:00 GMT 2012


On 01/26/2012 12:36 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I would like another approval, just in case you disagree with the way I changed the dummy declarations in the LTO testsuite.

Still ok.


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list