PR lto/51698 and the state of LTO + transactional memory

Aldy Hernandez aldyh@redhat.com
Wed Jan 25 13:36:00 GMT 2012


On 01/24/12 17:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:16 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes the ICE in the PR, though it won't do what
>> the user ultimately wants to do, given the limitations described.
>> Perhaps we could create another PR and tag it with an enhancement
>> request.
>
> An enhancement request pr sounds good.

Done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51997

> Ok.

Tests revealed minor mismatches in other parts of the testsuite, which I 
have fixed below.

I would like another approval, just in case you disagree with the way I 
changed the dummy declarations in the LTO testsuite.

Sorry for the noise, I thought I had it all done :).

Tested on x86-64 Linux.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: curr
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20120125/1783aff3/attachment.ksh>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list