[Patch,testsuite]: Fix yet another test case that breaks because it assumes sizeof(int) > 2

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:12:25AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> > Fixed as obvious as 1 << 15 fits always inside an int whereas 1<<16 does not.
> 
> Fixed as obvious is usually the term we use when work is checked in.
> 
> > Ok for trunk?
> 
> Ok for trunk is the term we use for work that hasn't been checked in.  So, I'm left wondering if the work is in or not.
> 
> Anyway, after reviewing the PR, it seems like they need a large enough
> offset to require 4 bytes of displacement size, and 1<<15 I suspect isn't
> actually large enough.  I think the proposed change removes a valuable
> test, so I don't think it is ok.

Yeah, this change is definitely wrong.
Georg-Johann, please, any time you propose similar changes always
try to reproduce the bug that was actually being fixed by the
PR in the question, with some older and newer compiler, and see if
your changes don't make the testcase useless as in this case.
Obviously changes to require int32plus or similar don't need such
investigation.

	Jakub