[RFH / Patch] PR 20140
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Mon Jan 2 15:07:00 GMT 2012
On 01/02/2012 08:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Bad, because currently many
> circumstances in which we do TREE_TYPE (init) = type are in fact benign:
I don't think they are benign. Even when types are equivalent, we need
to convert between them, as several things in the back end rely on
pointer equality, and we don't want different instantiations changing
the type in subtly different ways.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list