[PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

Andrew MacLeod amacleod@redhat.com
Wed Feb 8 22:01:00 GMT 2012

On 02/08/2012 04:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/02/2012, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> On 02/08/2012 04:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Should they be?
>> How's this look for a news item and the changes file?  Formatting seems
>> fine.
>   The news item is missing a + in C++
> It's not critical for the changes.html page since it's not likely to
> be printed, but it's better hyperlink style to say "see the [atomic
> wiki]" rather than "see the atomic wiki [here]"
That's what I get for following the same pattern as those TM jokers.

OK, hows this look?  I added a link in the news as well.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: doc2.diff
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20120208/682d2320/attachment.ksh>

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list