[SH] PR 39423

Kaz Kojima kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Aug 9 13:21:00 GMT 2012


Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
> Is that way of dealing with the mems OK?
> What could be a possible test case for the alias info issue?
> 
> Tested on rev 190151 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
> 
> and no new failures.

This patch is OK.

Regards,
	kaz



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list