[Patch ARM 1/6] Canonicalize neon_vaba and neon_vabal patterns.

Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org
Wed Aug 8 14:18:00 GMT 2012


On 3 August 2012 16:00, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
> On 30/07/12 12:43, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> Patch 1 fixes up the vaba and vabal patterns to use a canonical RTL
>>> form with the first operand to the plus being the more complex one.
>>
>> This patch canonicalizes the instruction patterns for the
>> vaba and vabal intrinsics so that the more complex operand
>> to plus is the first operand. This prevents needless
>> splitting in combine.
>>
>> For reference, this was found by the new test in gcc.target/neon/vaba*.c
>> and gcc.target/neon/vabal*.c from patch #4.
>>
>>
>> Ok ?
>>
>> regards,
>> Ramana
>>
>> 2012-07-27  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org>
>>
>>       * config/arm/neon.md (neon_vaba<mode>): Change to define_expand.
>>         (neon_vabal<mode>): Likewise.
>>         (neon_vaba_internal<mode>): New internal pattern.
>>         (neon_vabal_internal<mode>): New internal pattern.
>
> In principle, this is OK.  I think you could have achieved the same
> effect more simply though by just re-ordering the RTL but keeping the
> operand numbers the same.


Indeed - this look better ?


diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
index 7142c98..9e82564 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
@@ -2337,11 +2337,11 @@

 (define_insn "neon_vaba<mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:VDQIW 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
-        (plus:VDQIW (match_operand:VDQIW 1 "s_register_operand" "0")
-                    (unspec:VDQIW [(match_operand:VDQIW 2
"s_register_operand" "w")
-                                  (match_operand:VDQIW 3
"s_register_operand" "w")
-                                   (match_operand:SI 4
"immediate_operand" "i")]
-                                 UNSPEC_VABD)))]
+        (plus:VDQIW (unspec:VDQIW
+                   [(match_operand:VDQIW 2 "s_register_operand" "w")
+                    (match_operand:VDQIW 3 "s_register_operand" "w")
+                     (match_operand:SI 4 "immediate_operand" "i")] UNSPEC_VABD)
+                   (match_operand:VDQIW 1 "s_register_operand" "0")))]
   "TARGET_NEON"
   "vaba.%T4%#<V_sz_elem>\t%<V_reg>0, %<V_reg>2, %<V_reg>3"
   [(set (attr "neon_type")
@@ -2351,13 +2351,13 @@

 (define_insn "neon_vabal<mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:<V_widen> 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
-        (plus:<V_widen> (match_operand:<V_widen> 1 "s_register_operand" "0")
-                        (unspec:<V_widen> [(match_operand:VW 2
"s_register_operand" "w")
-                                           (match_operand:VW 3
"s_register_operand" "w")
-                                           (match_operand:SI 4
"immediate_operand" "i")]
-                          UNSPEC_VABDL)))]
+        (plus:<V_widen> (unspec:<V_widen>
+                       [(match_operand:VW 2 "s_register_operand" "w")
+                         (match_operand:VW 3 "s_register_operand" "w")
+                         (match_operand:SI 4 "immediate_operand"
"i")] UNSPEC_VABDL)
+                        (match_operand:<V_widen> 1 "s_register_operand" "0")))]
   "TARGET_NEON"
-  "vabal.%T4%#<V_sz_elem>\t%q0, %P2, %P3"
+  "vabal.%T4%#<V_sz_elem>\t%q0, %P1, %P2"
   [(set_attr "neon_type" "neon_vaba")]
 )


Ramana



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list