[RFC / RFH] Re-opened C++/51213 (access control under SFINAE)

[Jason Merrill]

Looks good.

-------- Original Message --------
 From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
 Sent: Thu, Aug 2, 2012 01:09 PM
 To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
 CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC / RFH] Re-opened C++/51213 (access control under SFINAE)

On 08/02/2012 06:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 12:21 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> +      if (complain & tf_error)
>> +        recheck_decl_substitution (spec, gen_tmpl, targ_ptr);
>> +      else
>> +        return error_mark_node;
>
> I think we want to be consistent with the end of the function about 
> whether we return error_mark_node or the decl after giving access 
> errors in non-SFINAE context; I don't have a strong opinion either 
> way, but this returns the decl, and the end of the function returns 
> error_mark_node.
I see. Then, I restarted testing with this variant.

Paolo.

/////////////////////