Continue strict-volatile-bitfields fixes

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 04/18/2012 06:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 18/04/12 16:37, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-1.c: Compile with
>> 	-fno-strict-volatile-bitfields.
>> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-3.c: Likewise.
>> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp15.c: Likewise.
>>
> 
> None of these have any volatile bitfields, so the option should be a no-op.

The problem is that we have to treat normal bitfields differently as
well, since a variable may later be declared as volatile.


Bernd