[patch] Remove strange case cost code

Richard Guenther richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 08:46:00 GMT 2012


On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is code in stmt.c since the initial checkin, that tries to
>> balance a switch tree according to some ascii heuristics. I see a
>> couple of problems with this code:
>>
>> 1. It doesn't seem to help much. With the attached patch to remove the
>> code, I see no compile time changes to e.g. compile GCC itself.
>>
>> 2. It isn't clear what the heuristic is based on (no reference to any
>> testing done, or a reference to a book or paper).
>>
>> 3. The heuristic is applied for case values in the range <-1,127>
>> (inclusive) even if the type of the switch expression isn't char or
>> int but e.g. an enum. This results in funny application of this
>> heuristic in GCC itself to e.g. some cases of enum rtx_code and enum
>> tree_code.
>
> Note that it would make a lot of sense to teach this heuristics predict.c
> and properly identify chars.

Indeed this would be the proper place to implement this logic.

> Also it is possble to get an historgrams from profile feedback into
> switch expansion. I always wanted to do that once switch expansion code
> is cleaned up and moved to gimple level...

Indeed.  At least the parts that expand switch stmts to (balanced) trees
should be moved to the GIMPLE level, retaining only the table-jump-like
expansions as switch stmts.

>>
>>
>> The attached patch removes the heuristic.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

>> Ciao!
>> Steven
>
>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list