[C++ Patch] PR 49152

[Marc Glisse]

On Sun, 15 Apr 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> a hybrid approach; I would suggest something like this: (a) if caret
> is in effect, then print
> the caret pointing to the symbol in question; otherwise (b) print the
> symbol and the type (as suggested by Marc).

I may have forgotten the details, but looking at the beginning of the PR, 
don't we always want the types? Show where the failing operator== is, and 
print the types of the 2 arguments? I tried to parenthesize your sentence 
so it meant that, but it wasn't convincing...

-- 
Marc Glisse