[C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
Andrew MacLeod
amacleod@redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 11:59:00 GMT 2012
On 04/05/2012 05:14 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> Ok. I suppose having a GIMPLE_ATOMIC is fine then.
>
Thanks for all the feedback, I haven't really had to play in gimple land
much lately. Some of those routines I guessed at what to do in order to
get through initial compilation and your comments help clear those up
too :-)
I will address everything next week since I doubt I will get to them
before the long weekend arrives here.
Andrew
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list