[Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
Tristan Gingold
gingold@adacore.com
Mon Apr 2 07:47:00 GMT 2012
On Mar 30, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/03/2012 12:22, Tristan Gingold ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this patch fixes this issue. Is it OK ?
>>>
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>>> Maybe we should include the AC_DEFINE action within GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC. Will try to do that.
>>>
>>> That looks like a cleaner solution, yes, and less chance for typos to sneak in.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is the 'cleaner solution': now GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC automatically define the HAVE_xxx variable.
>>
>> The description is now: Define to 1 if you have the `xxx' function. As a consequence, libgfortran/config.h.in was regenerated (with differences like:
>>
>> -/* acos is available */
>> +/* Define to 1 if you have the `acos' function. */
>> #undef HAVE_ACOS
>>
>> )
>>
>> Tested by rebuild libgfortran for ia64-hp-openvms and visual inspection of differences.
>>
>> I have CC: Paolo as he approved the first version of math.m4.
>>
>> Ok for trunk ?
>
> Yes.
Thanks, committed.
Tristan.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list