[Patch,AVR]: Fix PR50447 (2/n)

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 09/23/2011 10:41 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Yes, can be done for comparisons, too.  I'd prefer a separate patch for it. The
> subject is bit misleading; should be (2/n).

Also, I am curious about one thing: while this is of course a very 
pragmatic solution, you could also convert AVR to get rid of CC0, do 
this at expansion time, and get split-wide-types to work as intended.

compare-elim.c makes it relatively easy to remove CC0 nowadays.

Paolo