[PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c

[Terry Guo]

Hello,

Is it ok to commit?

BR,
Terry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:40 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
> case pr42894.c
> 
> Ping.
> 
> BR,
> Terry
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM
> > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> > Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
> > case pr42894.c
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the
> > patch intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok
> > to commit to trunk?
> >
> > BR,
> > Terry
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2011-08-25  Terry Guo  <terry.guo@arm.com>
> >
> >         * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
> >         architecture conflict.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  /* { dg-do compile } */
> >  /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
> >  /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
> > +/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
> >
> >  extern __thread int t;