[Patch, Ada, Darwin] Remove use of "flat_namespace" linker flag.
Iain Sandoe
developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk
Wed Sep 7 08:13:00 GMT 2011
The "-flat_namespace" linker flag defeats one of Darwin's nicer
features (two-level library namespaces).
AFAIU, it was habitually applied to unix projects in the early
versions of darwin to cater for assumptions about library ordering
made in such projects.
However, it is rarely needed these days (perhaps in the case of
imported unix projects using plugins sometimes).
It also upsets our careful use of an extension library to provide
current GCC facilities to Darwin 8...11 (which relies on the two-level
namespace to use both the system and GCC versions of libgcc_s) ...
and, in particular, this can cause subtle and difficult to diagnose
differences of behavior between darwin 9 and later systems.
---
Perhaps I'm missing something (please enlighten me if so), but I can't
presently see any reason why this needs to be applied to the Ada
_build_ ...
... and IMHO it's likely to cause end user issues defaulting to it for
shared library Ada make projects.
(better that the User should explicitly issue the flag where it is
required)
So is the following OK for trunk?
(no Ada regressions on *-darwin9, x86_64-darwin10).
cheers
Iain
ada:
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (darwin): Do not issue the
'-flat_namespace' linker flag during Ada build.
* mlib-tgt-specific-darwin.adb: Remove 'flat_namespace' flag from
the default shared library options.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 178615-ada-flat-namespace-diff.txt
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20110907/0e149e51/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list