[patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/50178
Ira Rosen
ira.rosen@linaro.org
Thu Sep 1 08:12:00 GMT 2011
Hi,
When vectorizing a function call we replace the original call with a
dummy statement to ensure that DCE later removes it. We also remove
its stmt_vec_info, which causes the segfault when we try to access it
through related pattern stmt. The following patch updates related
pattern stmt to be the dummy stmt.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-suse-linux.
OK for 4.6?
Thanks,
Ira
ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/50178
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_call): Update the related
pattern statement
before deleting the original call.
(vect_transform_stmt): Don't expect the related pattern statement match the
original statement after transformation.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/50178
* gfortran.dg/vect/pr50178.f90: New test.
Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr50178.f90
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr50178.f90 (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr50178.f90 (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+
+module yemdyn
+ implicit none
+ integer, parameter :: jpim = selected_int_kind(9)
+ integer, parameter :: jprb = selected_real_kind(13,300)
+ real(kind=jprb) :: elx
+ real(kind=jprb), allocatable :: xkcoef(:)
+ integer(kind=jpim),allocatable :: ncpln(:), npne(:)
+end module yemdyn
+
+subroutine suedyn
+
+ use yemdyn
+
+ implicit none
+
+ integer(kind=jpim) :: jm, jn
+ real(kind=jprb) :: zjm, zjn, zxxx
+
+ jn=0
+ do jm=0,ncpln(jn)
+ zjm=real(jm,jprb) / elx
+ xkcoef(npne(jn)+jm) = - zxxx*(zjm**2)**0.5_jprb
+ end do
+
+end subroutine suedyn
+
+! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } }
Index: tree-vect-stmts.c
===================================================================
--- tree-vect-stmts.c (revision 178373)
+++ tree-vect-stmts.c (working copy)
@@ -1583,6 +1583,14 @@ vectorizable_call (gimple stmt, gimple_stmt_iterat
new_stmt = gimple_build_assign (gimple_call_lhs (stmt),
build_zero_cst (type));
set_vinfo_for_stmt (new_stmt, stmt_info);
+ /* For pattern statements make the related statement to point to
+ NEW_STMT in order to be able to retrieve the original statement
+ information later. */
+ if (is_pattern_stmt_p (stmt_info))
+ {
+ gimple related = STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (stmt_info);
+ STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (vinfo_for_stmt (related)) = new_stmt;
+ }
set_vinfo_for_stmt (stmt, NULL);
STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info) = new_stmt;
gsi_replace (gsi, new_stmt, false);
@@ -4957,11 +4965,7 @@ vect_transform_stmt (gimple stmt, gimple_stmt_iter
the stmt_info of ORIG_STMT_IN_PATTERN. See more details in the
documentation of vect_pattern_recog. */
if (STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P (stmt_vinfo))
- {
- gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (stmt_vinfo)
- == orig_scalar_stmt);
- STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMT (stmt_vinfo) = vec_stmt;
- }
+ STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMT (stmt_vinfo) = vec_stmt;
}
}
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list