Go patch committed: Implement new syscall package
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Mon Oct 31 22:10:00 GMT 2011
Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:
> Ian,
>
>> I committed this patch which should fix this problem. Bootstrapped and
>> ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> thanks, but this is not enough:
>
> nawk: syntax error at source line 173
> context is
> ([^ >>> ]*)$", <<< cparam) == 0) {
> nawk: illegal statement at source line 173
> nawk: syntax error at source line 179
>
> and there is another instance on l.210. I haven't tried fixing this
> myself since I'm fighting with other issues.
Whoops, my patch was incomplete. Sorry about that. Fixed by this
patch. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and saw that it did not
change the code generated by the script. Committed to mainline.
Ian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: foo.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 748 bytes
Desc: patch
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20111031/67c94f5a/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list