[cxx-mem-model] Change library call for __atomic_op_fetch routines
Wed Oct 26 17:37:00 GMT 2011
On 10/26/2011 01:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> ! resolved to an instriction sequence. */
no no, its a mashup of "restricted instruction".
ok, maybe not.
>> ! gcc_assert (TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0) == fndecl);
>> ! TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0) = builtin_decl_explicit(ext_call);
> I do wonder if we ought not put the original back after the expand.
hum. I suppose that wouldn't hurt. I don't think it should make any
difference since Im not modifying whats in the table, but I can give it
a shot. If it bootstraps, which I presume it will, I'll check it in
with the original decl replaced.
More information about the Gcc-patches