[PATCH] Add an intermediate coverage format for gcov

[Mike Stump]

On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Sharad Singhai <singhai@google.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. I see that you are asking for
> unmangled function names whereas the current patch supports only
> mangled names. I can print unmangled names under another option. Would
> that work?

I defer to the person that says ok.  :-)