[C++ Patch] PR 32614

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 01:16 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2011 12:56 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thus clearly the documentation is wrong ;)
>>>>
>>>> ;-)
>>>> Not necessarily.  Paolo does not say why that line was added.
>>>> I don't remember adding that line to change the default.
>>>
>>> Indeed, as far as I can see, you added that line while *preserving* the
>>> existing behavior and preparing the C++ variant of the pretty_print
>>> machinery. Thus, AFAICS, 72 never existed anywhere and, strictly
>>> speaking,
>>> there is nothing to *restore*.
>>
>> I do not know what you mean by "there is nothing to restore".
>> Look at the other mail by Richard.  The C pretty-printer *post*-dated
>> the C++ pretty printer.
>
> Hey, I don't own viewcvs, of svn, for that matter, you could also dare to
> help a bit with this crazy archeological task, can't you?!?

Let's not be quick to judgment and throw more rocks before we get all
the facts. Please understand that I have been helping
and looking at past changesets and present history. I appreciate that Richard
did not think I was just be delusional and helped going back further.
 I can help by presenting history.  It is not my fault when you choose
to doubt or ignore.
That isn't under my control.