[PATCH] Optimize COND_EXPR where then/else operands are INTEGER_CSTs of different size than the comparison operands

[Ira Rosen]

On 6 October 2011 19:28, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> > +             i = 1;
>> > +             if ((rhs_code == COND_EXPR || rhs_code == VEC_COND_EXPR)
>>
>> I don't understand why we need VEC_COND_EXPR here.
>
> Only for completeness, as VEC_COND_EXPR is the same weirdo thingie like
> COND_EXPR.  I can leave that out if you want.

But we mark stmts that we want to vectorize here. I think that
expecting a vector stmt is confusing. So yes, please, leave it out.

Thanks,
Ira

>
>        Jakub
>