[PATCH 3/7] Emit macro expansion related diagnostics

Dodji Seketeli dodji@redhat.com
Tue Oct 4 20:28:00 GMT 2011

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

> So then this change would make
> _Complex c;
> OK, but not
> static _Complex c;
> because the first declspec is not from a macro, right?


>> I believe you noted this at some point and
>> agreed with me that ideally each declspec should come with its location
>> but that's work for another occasion.
> If I'm right about the above example, I think I'd rather hold off this
> declspecs change until that time.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list