[PATCH 3/7] Emit macro expansion related diagnostics
Dodji Seketeli
dodji@redhat.com
Tue Oct 4 20:28:00 GMT 2011
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
> So then this change would make
>
> _Complex c;
>
> OK, but not
>
> static _Complex c;
>
> because the first declspec is not from a macro, right?
Yes.
>
>> I believe you noted this at some point and
>> agreed with me that ideally each declspec should come with its location
>> but that's work for another occasion.
>
> If I'm right about the above example, I think I'd rather hold off this
> declspecs change until that time.
OK.
--
Dodji
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list