PR other/51174: handle architectures with no DECL_COMDAT_GROUP

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Nov 29 01:42:00 GMT 2011


On 11/28/2011 03:54 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:47:46AM -0600, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>>> @@ -4198,7 +4198,7 @@ ipa_tm_create_version_alias (struct cgra
>>>>>   TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED (tm_name) = 1;
>>>>>
>>>>>   /* Perform the same remapping to the comdat group.  */
>>>>> -  if (DECL_COMDAT (new_decl))
>>>>> +  if (HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP&&  DECL_COMDAT (new_decl))
>>>>>     DECL_COMDAT_GROUP (new_decl) = tm_mangle (DECL_COMDAT_GROUP (old_decl));
>>>>>
>>>>>   new_node = cgraph_same_body_alias (NULL, new_decl, info->new_decl);
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to test if (DECL_ONE_ONLY (new_decl))
>> instead?  That is actually test for non-NULL DECL_COMDAT_GROUP
>> and is what e.g. cp/ uses as guards on tweaking DECL_COMDAT_GROUP.
>>
>> BTW, the formatting is wrong above, no space before && and two spaces after
>> it.
> 
> That will work as well.
> 
> Which solution should be committed?

Please use the DECL_ONE_ONLY test.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list