Fwd: [C++ PATCH] PR 50958 and correct lookup of literal operators

Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd@verizon.net
Wed Nov 9 03:08:00 GMT 2011


Ping...
Sorry I forgot to cc you.
I needed rebase anyhow after all the churn recently.

Also, I started a food fight with 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-11/msg00124.html.
My idea was that if C++ explicitly does not use the fixed point suffixes 
then, in C++11 mode, we should pass them along as user-defined literals.
I think the point was lost ;-).  But what would you say to a three-liner 
and a test case?  And the idea?

Ed

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_udlit
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20111109/21247516/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CL_udlit
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20111109/21247516/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list