RFC: explicitely mark out-of-scope deaths
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Thu May 26 15:07:00 GMT 2011
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:43:45PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> --- tree-stdarg.c.orig 2011-05-26 14:15:01.000000000 +0200
> +++ tree-stdarg.c 2011-05-26 14:15:41.000000000 +0200
> @@ -872,8 +872,12 @@ execute_optimize_stdarg (void)
> if (get_gimple_rhs_class (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt))
> == GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS)
> {
> + /* Check for ap ={v} {}. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == CONSTRUCTOR
> + && TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (rhs))
> + continue;
> /* Check for ap[0].field = temp. */
> - if (va_list_counter_struct_op (&si, lhs, rhs, true))
> + else if (va_list_counter_struct_op (&si, lhs, rhs, true))
> continue;
Perhaps optimize_stdarg_builtin could fold __builtin_va_end into
this ap ={v} {} for non-pointer va_list to make it clear the variable
is undefined afterwards, currently it just optimizes it away completely.
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list