[PATCH] C++0x, implement final on classes
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Sun May 15 15:43:00 GMT 2011
On 05/14/2011 06:49 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 02:19 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>> Cool, thanks! I'm not quite sure whether there are ambiguities in the
>> case
>> of elaborate-specifiers, but I suppose those can be fixed later.
>
> Good point. In the case that
> !cp_parser_next_token_starts_class_definition_p, we should rewind to
> before what we parsed as virt-specifiers.
cp_lexer_token_position and cp_lexer_set_token_position should be useful
for this.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list