rs6000_handle_option global state avoidance, part 1

[Michael Meissner]

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:08:24AM -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
> >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the
> >>next case without comments to indicate if this was intended.  I added
> >>comments to make the semantics explicit.  Given the documentation, it
> >>may well be intentional for -mcmodel= but is more doubtful for -mfpu=.
> >
> >I doubt that either of the fall through cases was intended.
> >
> >Alan, is mcmodel suppose to set m64?
> >
> >Michael, is mfpu suppose to set mrecip?
> 
> No.  There was a break statement at the end of case OPT_mfpu which
> disappeared when OPT_mrecip was added.

Yes, it was an error on my part.  Sorry.  I will fix the GCC 4.6 branch.  I
will hold off fixing the on trunk, on the assumption this patch will go in.  I
can fix it if desired.

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
5 Technology Place Drive, M/S 2757, Westford, MA 01886-3141, USA
meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com	fax +1 (978) 399-6899