[PATCH] libstdc++ ABI issues with __int128

[Benjamin Kosnik]

> Well, such stricter checking wouldn't be completely painless, e.g. currently
> both current baseline_symbols.txt and the ones I've posted don't include the
> two TLS: lines, because of the fear that not everyone has TLS enabled.
> If baseline_symbols.txt right now miss some symbols, it is not a big deal
> if it is not in the base version (with my patch base versions), but with
> stricter checking it would complain.  Either we'd just say that TLS is
> assumed on these targets and add the TLS: lines, or we'd need to invent
> some symbol conditionalizing or something.

Ah, yes.

We will keep on doing the present solution for libstdc++.so.6 and
invent something clever later.

-benjamin