PATCH [2/n]: Prepare x32: Convert pointer to TLS symbol if needed

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 14:39:00 GMT 2011


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@linaro.org> wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> writes:
>> @@ -706,7 +706,13 @@ precompute_register_parameters (int num_actuals, struct arg_data *args,
>>          pseudo now.  TLS symbols sometimes need a call to resolve.  */
>>       if (CONSTANT_P (args[i].value)
>>           && !targetm.legitimate_constant_p (args[i].mode, args[i].value))
>> -       args[i].value = force_reg (args[i].mode, args[i].value);
>> +       {
>> +         if (GET_MODE (args[i].value) != args[i].mode)
>> +           args[i].value = convert_to_mode (args[i].mode,
>> +                                            args[i].value,
>> +                                            args[i].unsignedp);
>> +         args[i].value = force_reg (args[i].mode, args[i].value);
>> +       }
>
> But if GET_MODE (args[i].value) != args[i].mode, then the call to
> targetm.legitimate_constant_p looks wrong.  The mode passed in the
> first argument is supposed to the mode of the second argument.
>
> Is there any reason why this and the following:
>
>        /* If we are to promote the function arg to a wider mode,
>           do it now.  */
>
>        if (args[i].mode != TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (args[i].tree_value)))
>          args[i].value
>            = convert_modes (args[i].mode,
>                             TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (args[i].tree_value)),
>                             args[i].value, args[i].unsignedp);
>
> need to be done in the current order?  I can't think of any off-hand.
> If not, would swapping them also fix the bug?
>
> (I can't review this either way, of course.)

It works on the testcase.  I will do a full test.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list