[PATCH] PR fortran/49268

[Steve Kargl]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:14:39AM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote:
> On 6/2/11 2:42 PM, "Langton, Asher" <langton2@llnl.gov> wrote:
> >On 6/2/11 2:11 PM, "Steve Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:59:03PM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote:
> >>> This patch fixes a bug where the wrong code was generated for
> >>>assumed-size
> >>> Cray pointees. The fix is simple, but a bit ugly. Bootstrapped and
> >>> regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for trunk?
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Asher
> >>> 
> >>> 2011-06-02  Asher Langton  <langton2@llnl.gov>
> >>> 
> >>>         PR fortran/49268
> >>>         * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Treat assumed-size
> >>>Cray
> >>>         pointees as AS_EXPLICIT.
> >>> 
> >>> 2011-06-02  Asher Langton  <langton2@llnl.gov>
> >>> 
> >>>         PR fortran/49268
> >>>         * gfortran.dg/PR49268.f90: New test.
> >>
> >>OK.
> >
> >Committed at revision 174584.
> 
> A gfortran user here at LLNL asked if this could be backported to the 4.6
> branch. I bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> Okay for 4.6?

OK.

-- 
Steve