Ping:Re: Skip building target libiberty for arm*-*-linux-androideabi

Jing Yu jingyu@google.com
Fri Jun 3 18:21:00 GMT 2011


Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02208.html

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jing Yu <jingyu@google.com> wrote:
> Based on discussion on another thread
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg06627.html),
> what Joseph recommended was ripping out all support for building
> libiberty for the target side as it is not needed. Thus I doubt
> skipping target-libiberty for all targets is acceptable.
> I don't have the bandwidth to work on the ideal patch. Thus I am
> wondering if we can skip target-libiberty for androideabi target
> before the ideal patch is out.
>
> Thanks,
> Jing
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ye Joey <joey.ye.cc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Jing Yu <jingyu@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Building gcc-4.6 arm android toolchain fails because of an
>>> incompatible function definition between libiberty and bionic.
>>>
>>> Thanking Joseph, I have learned that "there's no such thing as a
>>> target libiberty" and we should rip all the target-libiberty rules
>>> out. I don't know if someone is working on it. Before that patch comes
>>> out, can we add arm*-*-linux-androideabi to the list of targets where
>>> target-libiberty is skipped?
>>>
>> How about skip libiberty for all targets then?
>>
>> - Joey
>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list