Correct fix for scheduler bug PR11320

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Fri Jul 22 18:36:00 GMT 2011


On 07/22/2011 10:00 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> It's getting confused about loads/stores being control_flow_insns and
>> getting scheduled past each other nonetheless. Mind testing the following?
> 
> s/flag_non_call_exceptions/cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions/
> 

Why test either, since control_flow_insn_p has already done so?


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list