[PATCH 4/6] Shrink-wrapping

[Paul Koning]

On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:

> ...
> 
>> It'd also be nice to get rid of all these big blocks of code that are
>> conditional on preprocessor macros, but I realise you're just following
>> existing practice in the surrounding code, so again it can be left to
>> a future cleanup.
> 
> Yeah, this function is quite horrid - so many different paths through it.
> 
> However, it looks like the only target without HAVE_prologue is actually
> pdp11, so we're carrying some unnecessary baggage for purely
> retrocomputing purposes. Paul, can you fix that?

Sure, but...  I searched for HAVE_prologue and I can't find any place that set it.  There are tests for it, but I see nothing that defines it (other than df-scan.c which defines it as zero if it's not defined, not sure what the point of that is).

I must be missing something...

	paul