[pph] Test cleanup (issue4572050)

[Gabriel Charette]

After having a look at how pph.exp works last Friday I think I could
do this myself easily enough.

Or are you still modifying the tests and want me to avoid touching this for now?

Gab

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Lawrence Crowl <crowl@google.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/11, Gabriel Charette <gchare@google.com> wrote:
>> One problem now though: `// pph asm xdiff`, only flags for asm diffs,
>> but those could be different diffs after a change (for the better or
>> worse) and this won't be caught. It's probably hard to get something
>> precise on this, but maybe we could simply add the # of lines of diff
>> expected, e.g. `// pph asm xdiff 32`. Then we XFAIL if the number of
>> expected lines in the diff match, but actually fail if the number of
>> lines in the diff is now different.
>>
>> I'm not very familiar with dg.. Is that doable? Would be very helpful
>> at this stage.
>
> That looks easy enough.  I need to finish the current test stuff
> before I get to that though.
>
> --
> Lawrence Crowl
>