PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/47502: Never combine asm statement
H.J. Lu
hongjiu.lu@intel.com
Fri Jan 28 04:58:00 GMT 2011
It is a bad idea to combine asm statement. This patch disallows it.
Any comments?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
commit a11b95180e53d3a0bc3eabad5594859cea7c3334
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan 27 18:12:27 2011 -0800
Never combine asm statement.
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.x32 b/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
index 0ae4761..ef65e7b 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-01-27 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/47502
+ * combine.c (cant_combine_insn_p): Never combine asm statement.
+
2011-01-25 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR target/47446
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 3ee53e6..d4a8079 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -2122,13 +2122,14 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx insn)
/* Never combine loads and stores involving hard regs that are likely
to be spilled. The register allocator can usually handle such
reg-reg moves by tying. If we allow the combiner to make
- substitutions of likely-spilled regs, reload might die.
+ substitutions of likely-spilled regs, reload might die. Never
+ combine asm statement.
As an exception, we allow combinations involving fixed regs; these are
not available to the register allocator so there's no risk involved. */
set = single_set (insn);
if (! set)
- return 0;
+ return asm_noperands (PATTERN (insn)) > 0;
src = SET_SRC (set);
dest = SET_DEST (set);
if (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG)
@@ -2144,7 +2145,7 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx insn)
&& targetm.class_likely_spilled_p (REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (dest))))))
return 1;
- return 0;
+ return asm_noperands (src) > 0;
}
struct likely_spilled_retval_info
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32 b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
index 597294e..8759881 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-01-27 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/47502
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c: New.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c: Likewise.
+
2011-01-25 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR target/47446
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..727afe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O" } */
+
+void
+foo (const void *xxxxx, void *yyyyy, long y)
+{
+ asm volatile ("" :: "c" ((xxxxx)), "d" ((yyyyy)), "S" (y));
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1f57ea0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+int
+foo (int how, const void *set, void *oset)
+{
+ int resultvar;
+ asm volatile (""
+ : "=a" (resultvar)
+ : "0" (14) , "b" (how), "c" ((set)), "d" ((oset)), "S" (65 / 8) : "memory", "cc");
+ return resultvar;
+}
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list