[PATCH 00/10] Make -floop-interchange catch almost all testcases of -ftree-loop-linear

Jack Howarth howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu
Mon Jan 17 06:31:00 GMT 2011


On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:05:05AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi Richi,
> 
> Here is the first part of the patch to remove the lambda framework.
> These patches un-xfail most of the transforms that we wanted to see
> with -floop-interchange and that were part of the testsuite of
> -ftree-loop-linear:
> 
> gcc.dg/graphite/block-0.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/block-1.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/block-4.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/block-7.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/block-8.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-1.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-11.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-12.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-13.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-14.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-15.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-8.c
> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-mvt.c
> 
> The only xfails remaining to be fixed before removing the lambda
> framework are: 
> - interchange-2.c: some problem linked to the scop detection
> - interchange-3.f90: data dependence analysis does not validate the interchange.
> I will continue my investigation on these two xfails.
> 
> With the patches, the Graphite testsuite has the following XFAILs:
> 
> block-4.c:59:/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
> interchange-2.c:55:/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be interchanged" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ 
> pr35356-3.c:39:/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop_1" 0 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
> pr37485.c:31:/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* }} } */
> 
> block-1.f90:11:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> block-2.f:20:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 2 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> block-3.f90:15:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "number of SCoPs: 1" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> block-3.f90:16:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> block-4.f90:18:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "number of SCoPs: 1" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> block-4.f90:19:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> interchange-1.f:44:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be interchanged" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> interchange-3.f90:27:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be interchanged" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> pr14741.f90:27:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "number of SCoPs: 1" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> pr14741.f90:28:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "will be loop blocked" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> scop-1.f:12:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "number of SCoPs: 1" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } } 
> 
> I'm committing these patches to the graphite branch for regstrap and
> SPEC testing.

Regression tests for these 10 patches on x86_64-apple-darwin10 shows no graphite regressions...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg01391.html

> 
> Sebastian Pop (10):
>   Add debug_gmp_value.
>   Print the data dependence polyhedron in the PPL format.
>   Test the profitability of interchange on the perfect nest.
>   Fix pbb_remove_duplicate_pdrs.
>   speedup compilation
>   Correct the precedence relation.
>   Use PIP to determine the integer feasibility of a constraint system.
>   Minimize the number of expensive calls to ppl_powerset_is_empty.
>   Expect at least the version 0.11 of PPL.
>   Remove the temporary array for reductions written to memory.
> 
>  ChangeLog.graphite                              |    5 +
>  configure                                       |    6 +-
>  configure.ac                                    |    4 +-
>  gcc/ChangeLog.graphite                          |   96 ++++++++++
>  gcc/doc/install.texi                            |    2 +-
>  gcc/graphite-dependences.c                      |  226 +++++++++--------------
>  gcc/graphite-interchange.c                      |   16 +-
>  gcc/graphite-poly.c                             |   13 +-
>  gcc/graphite-ppl.c                              |   76 ++++++++
>  gcc/graphite-ppl.h                              |    3 +
>  gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c                     |   43 ++++-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-0.c         |    3 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-1.c         |    5 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-4.c         |    2 +
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-7.c         |    3 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-8.c         |   58 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-1.c   |    4 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-11.c  |    3 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-12.c  |    3 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-13.c  |   54 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-14.c  |   58 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-15.c  |   53 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-8.c   |    5 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-mvt.c |    3 +-
>  gcc/tree-data-ref.c                             |    4 +-
>  25 files changed, 573 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/block-8.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-13.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-14.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-15.c



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list